Search for: "People v Peters"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
For example, the plaintiff in Bulun Bulun v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 11:00 am
” Hilton v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 3:32 pm
From People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
The only no vote was by Peter Yates of New York. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 1:54 pm
Weibust, Peter A. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am
Under the State Constitution, the Supreme Court is a court of “general original” (i.e., “unlimited”) jurisdiction, meaning it is “competent to entertain all causes of action unless its jurisdiction has been specifically proscribed” (People v Correa, 15 NY3d 213 [2010] [quotations omitted]). [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:35 am
” People v National Rifle Association, Inc. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
In most legal orgs, this percentage is near negligible, especially if the org is being honest with itself about (i) how many personnel in putative innovation roles (legal operations, knowledge management, project management) are consumed by active matters, existing programs, and administration, (ii) how much technology spend is maintenance, and (iii) how many projects are purely aspirational with no real resources save the illusory spare hours of already busy people. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
In addition, we will continue to follow the trial and appeal, respectively, in the complex contempt of Congress cases involving former White House advisers Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
The purpose is to show that this defendant was put in fear by these people. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 9:30 pm
“Less than a week before the 50th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:45 am
’” Even though the Norton v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:19 pm
From Miller v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
" Abrams v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
In Williams v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
In Williams v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
” (the answer, for most people, is likely to be “not very well”). [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
What these people had demonstrated during this period of time was that they did not recognize the sovereignty of the People’s Republic of China over HKSAR, and they did not support the policy of the “One Country, Two systems”. [read post]
