Search for: "People v Reed" Results 161 - 180 of 732
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
, asked the IPKat's old friend Steve Getzoff (Reed Smith LLP). [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  One thing people are realizing is that TM is messy. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall observed of the commerce power in McCulloch v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:41 am by Tyler Gillett
Whether the restriction at issue is content-based depends on how the Justices decide to apply the ruling in Reed v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:42 am by Amanda Shanor
At stake in the first issue is how to interpret a key Supreme Court opinion from 2015: Reed v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 3:03 pm by Donald Thompson
However, the jury was entitled to credit some of [their] testimony while discounting other aspects' (Kuykendall, 43 AD3d at 495; see People v Reed, 40 NY2d 204, 208). [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 8:26 am by Reference Staff
Johnson, along with his colleague Pennsylvania Senator David Reed, compromised on a new quota scheme. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, sorts out the issues involved in the battle between Apple and the government, in light of all the circumstances, including the February 29, 2016 opinion by Eastern District of New York Judge James Orenstein in the separate Apple iPhone unlocking case. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:04 am by Amanda Shanor
He said, “I don’t see how that gets you out of the content category” under Reed v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was also handed down on meaning in Public Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company v HarperCollins and Catherine Belthon [2021] EWHC 3141 (QB), the second libel claim to result from Putin’s People (above). [read post]