Search for: "People v Rosa" Results 161 - 180 of 228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2022, 8:50 am by Eric Goldman
I’ve written this in preparation for the Supreme Court appeal in NetChoice v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:46 am by Frank Cranmer
: on two significant decisions on the legal recognition of same-sex couples: Buhuceanu and Others v Romania and Maymulakhin and Markiv v Ukraine. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:05 pm by Michael S. Snarr
A February 2006 fact sheet published by the Foreign Agriculture Service explains that the SPS Agreement was adopted during the Uruguay Round with the support of “[v]irtually all countries, including the United States” because countries previously had used vague and opaque SPS measures to disguise restrictions on trade. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am by Tess Bridgeman
Joseph Votel (January 29, 2024) The Just Security Podcast: ICJ Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 6:15 pm by John Culhane
The sub rosa stuff is vitally important to the day-to-day lives of LGBT people, but it’s (mostly) pretty low-risk. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
In 1954, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
In 1954, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 10:31 pm
The joining of two people in a life of mutual fidelity signifies to us the mystery of the union between Christ and his Church, and so it is worthy of being honored among all people. [read post]