Search for: "People v Stokes" Results 161 - 180 of 224
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2014, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Bissell
One Kurdish activist in Kobani was quoted as saying, “people underestimate the power of determination. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
I think it is fair to say that a lot of people thought that was all the statute did. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR says the Supreme Court seized the initiative for the Civil Rights Movement with Brown v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR says the Supreme Court seized the initiative for the Civil Rights Movement with Brown v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court emphasizes as in the case of United States v Rombon, Stokes v Genakos and People v Jiles that there exists no constitutional right to juvenile treatment. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am by Adam Wagner
Closed societies encounter terrorism too; it seems a sad reality that people will always find a reason to kill innocent people. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 2:14 pm
A survey shows that people do like the outcomes of most of the big Roberts Court cases, and that's out of line with the declining approval of the Court, but it might be that people are giving extra weight to some of the big cases, the ones they don't like — maybe Kelo (for Republicans) and Bush v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:06 am by New Books Script
HV 9650 R42 S86 2007 Pit of shame : the real ballad of Reading Gaol Anthony Stokes ; with a foreword by Theodore Dalrymple. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:57 am
There's a review of the second edition of Simon Stokes' Art & Copyright on Art & Artifice here. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:24 pm by Shahram Miri
  Prob C §16068; Salter v Lerner (2009) 176 CA4th 1184. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
"[A] party's awareness of the requirements of the CSSA is not the dispositive consideration under the statute" (Lepore v. [read post]