Search for: "People v. AG" Results 161 - 180 of 8,302
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
"  Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Ben Roberts-Smith’s 10-day appeal against a decision dismissing his defamation case over reports in The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald starts on 5 February 2024. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Will Baude
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc   New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Michael Lowe
Another added severity in the arrest of johns in Texas:  lots of these undercover operations are fervent in trying to arrest sex buyers who are allegedly making arrangements involving those under the age of adulthood. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
Today represents Part 2A which covers Sections I-V of Chief Justice Crampton’s decision. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
MK testified that he and Peter Dent had informally discussed his retirement, and he asserted that it had been his intention to remain with the employer until the age of 75. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
MK testified that he and Peter Dent had informally discussed his retirement, and he asserted that it had been his intention to remain with the employer until the age of 75. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:31 am by Jacquelyn Greene
” North Carolina’s law regarding place of confinement for people under the age of 18 therefore applies to people being held securely pending return to the demanding state under the ICJ. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]