Search for: "People v. Ahmed"
Results 161 - 180
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
A report published by Meta has warned that, despite its attempts to remove a number of firms who scrape users’ Facebook and Instagram profiles, spyware continues to evolve and target people indiscriminately online. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
Lord Faulks KC, chairman of the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), told the BBC World at One that “most people don’t want anybody to know anything about their private life, but if they are prepared to discuss it then it is not unreasonable for the press to write about it. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:58 pm
Russian President Vladimir V. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:22 pm
In the 2012 case of United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am
Murphy v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:46 am
Your client Gerald is accused of the drive-by shooting of four people. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 4:15 pm
Obiter J continues to analyse and reflect with this excellent post: (1) The August Disorder – more sentencing …. (2) A seriously disturbing family case “Sentencing remarks by His Honour Judge Milmo QC for the case of R v Ahmed Pelle at the Crown Court Nottingham are now available. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
In other news, the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Michael Chiaramonte (2L), Vittoria Fiorenza (2L), Hanna Shoshany (3L), Victoria Wagnerman (2L) The competition involved a criminal case of People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 12:16 pm
Ahmed A. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:14 pm
On the other hand, if newspapers can identify the people concerned, they may be able to give a more vivid and compelling account which will stimulate discussion about the use of freezing orders and their impact on the communities in which the individuals live. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 7:40 am
Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 12:16 pm
Ahmed A. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
It states: “Article 7. (1) All powers in the Republic belong to the people, and their exercise on behalf of the people shall be effected only under, and by the authority of, this Constitution(2) This Constitution is, as the solemn expression of the will of the people, the supreme law of the Republic, and if any other law is inconsistent with this Constitution that other law shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 5:03 am
Georgia v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 3:24 pm
Rakusen v Jepson borne in mind. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
15 Jul 2006, 7:32 am
But, like a lot of conservatives, he was so irritated by the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 1:51 am
But they're not saying there's a potential antitrust issue in each and every one of the examples they provide, and they may want that article to be a tale of caution for app developers who create features that don't justify standalone products.The first major software patent damages case I remember was Stac v. [read post]
