Search for: "People v. Barnett"
Results 161 - 180
of 551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2017, 5:07 pm
The case of Texiera v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:48 pm
And, although I hoped against hope that Judge Silberman was not telegraphing his position when he strongly asserted that the “logic” of Wickard v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:22 am
Barnett (Embezzling Funds from Indian Tribe) U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 7:55 am
Barnette (1943), the Pledge of Allegiance case. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:46 pm
Harrington v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 3:11 pm
See Cuba v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:39 pm
Barry Barnett We quote. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:08 am
Barry Barnett Subscribe here. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 6:52 am
[Barnett @ Volokh v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:04 pm
Darby, and Wickard v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:30 am
But people can reasonably argue that the recent debate over federalism issues in King v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 11:11 am
& Mktg., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Michael Smith and I have just filed an amicus brief that I drafted for Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment (AWARE) in the Michigan Second Amendment stun gun case, People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:47 am
Nevertheless, the principle that the (federal) government cannot force people to buy products from private companies is not necessarily a conservative one. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:30 am
In an earlier post, Josh noted that Texas v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
The Barnett/Blackman casebook includes a photo of the assassination and hotel, right before an excerpt from Printz v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 12:49 pm
The logic of that case equally applies to punishing people for refusing to stand for a flag salute, see Lipp v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
Barnett at Gun-Rights Showdown, who writes:"Today, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Heller v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:52 am
This is well within the normal competency of judges and is exactly what the lower court in Lee Optical v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:41 pm
Futures v. [read post]
