Search for: "People v. Barrett"
Results 161 - 180
of 838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Sackett v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 7:29 am
” Barrett said that this term “define[s] cases that are so well settled that no political actors and no people seriously push for their overruling. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
See, e.g., Garrison v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:44 am
Roe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 11:13 am
More recently, the court in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:03 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Monday in Trump v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm
(One would be interested, for example, as to whether or not Amy Comey Barrett, a sure candidate to succeed Ruth Ginsburg should Trump be in power when that day comes, adheres to the views articulated by Vermeule or by her Notre Dame colleague Patrick Deneen, who also condemns liberalism in all of its purported aspects. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Justice Gorsuch was silent, as were Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett, letting this precedent of the Fourth Circuit stand Third, in Kincaid v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:42 am
In a post at the Understanding the ADA blog, Willian Goren discusses Barrett’s judicial approach and her cases involving people with disabilities. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
The test of great scholarship is that it changes the way people think and the way people live. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 3:19 pm
In Branti v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
Barrett, St. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:00 am
” Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joined Alito’s opinion. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
As Justice Barrett has explained, originalists “care about what people understood words to mean at the time that the law was enacted because those people had the authority to make law. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:29 am
See Schriber-Schroth Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Thirty years before Dobbs, the Supreme Court decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:36 am
The conflict around the suitability of Amy Coney Barrett, then, reflects the way law is now understood as the expression of a striving for (eternal?) [read post]
