Search for: "People v. Baxter" Results 161 - 180 of 183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
That's a lot of m*****f***ing.First there was People v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 10:57 am
This time, I turn to his decision from Wednesday in Federal Insurance Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:07 am
And, notwithstanding the harsh language of those foul-mouthed justices on the Court of Appeal, the California Supreme Court had never used the term in print.Until Thursday, that is.Justice Baxter pulled the trigger in the California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:55 am
(2) During arguments, Justice Carlos Moreno had an interesting exchange that had echoes of Brown v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
Justice Marvin Baxter suggested several times through his questioning that Prop 22 may have decided the matter, and that the court should not overrule the people on this question. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
  The decision in Reidel v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:00 pm
Chief Justice George, and Justices Baxter and Corrigan concurred.Justice Werdegar dissented. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 12:05 pm
Street commerce in drugs and sex forces innocent people to share their neighborhoods with pimps, prostitutes, and drug dealers who use their streets as a bazaar for illegal transactions. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:25 pm
Yesterday's oral argument in Gentry v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
One of the male justices (Baxter or George) then asked if it is Mr. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 10:04 am
Justice Baxter agrees, but writes separately to slo say that he'd vote to affirm even if only X existed. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 9:48 am
We have previously compared the fierce competition between Supreme Court correspondents Linda Greenhouse, of the New York Times, and Jan Crawford Greenburg, of the Chicago Tribune, to the rivalry between Margo Channing (Bette Davis) and Eve Harrington (Anne Baxter) in All About Eve. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 9:48 am
We have previously compared the fierce competition between Supreme Court correspondents Linda Greenhouse, of the New York Times, and Jan Crawford Greenbrug, of the Chicago Tribune, to the rivalry between Margo Channing (Bette Davis) and Eve Harrington (Anne Baxter) in All About Eve. [read post]