Search for: "People v. Bush"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 8:56 pm
When the Bush tax cuts were enacted in 2001 (and to some extent in 2003), many people thought that the sunset provision was a gimmick designed to limit the accounting damage from deeming the cuts permanent (at least in the sense that any legislation can be permanent, which is to say that it remains in effect until repealed). [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:12 pm
Since Bush v. [read post]
28 Sep 2006, 8:17 pm
A number of people have already blogged about the Trademark Dilution Revision Act ("TDRA") that both Houses of Congress recently passed, and that President Bush is expected to sign into law within the next couple of weeks. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
Levine V. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:45 am
Soon after they reverse Roe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Ever since Bush v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 12:47 am
McLeary, 484 Mich. 397 (2009) (see our posts here and here); remanded People v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:29 pm
Bush’s former solicitor general, Gregory G. [read post]
28 May 2016, 1:14 pm
Our clients are “people” and not “cases” or “files. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:44 pm
People v Pacer, 6 NY3d 504, 510-512). [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 8:28 am
In People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
See ACLU v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:57 am
Per Curiam decisions can also be granted in highly-controversial cases like Bush v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 11:55 am
Here is the abstract: This paper examines the Reconstruction-era case of United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 11:35 am
Supreme Court was the decision to permit federal preemption in the Riegel v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm
Five years ago today, the Supreme Court handed down its 5-4 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm
Perhaps the most egregiously political deviation from precedent since Bush v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:15 pm
The American Civil Liberties Union represents al-Kidd in the case, al-Kidd v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 9:47 am
When you mention Private Investigators in the context of a matrimonial dispute, most people think of what is portrayed in movies or in television of a gumshoe Detective tailing a car or hiding in the bushes, trying to get the goods on a suspected cheating spouse. [read post]
