Search for: "People v. Cope"
Results 161 - 180
of 452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2011, 5:32 am
So far she has only unearthed Lifestyle Management Ltd. v Frater [2010] EWHC 3258 (TCC) (10 December 2010, noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 7:30 am
Transnational repression, as it is called, is spreading faster than democracies can cope with it. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
It suggests that the beneficiary will have to cope in the same way as any other family on a similar income. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
It suggests that the beneficiary will have to cope in the same way as any other family on a similar income. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
The only old relist we’re aware of from OT2013 is Cope v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:31 am
A lawyer, like most people, can make a bad call. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Ever since Bush v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 10:05 am
The article suggests humanists cannot cope with data. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:11 pm
Indeed they are, due to the Supreme Court’s holding in Marquette Nat’l Bank v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 3:49 am
Coun. for the Blind v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 9:23 am
Unfortunately, Parts IV, V, VI, which deal with substantive IP rights and practice, loses the personal touch and insight that the early and final chapters possess. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
Nicholas also set out the position in respect of injunctive relief following the Huawei v ZTE framework. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
After all, Atlas Roofing Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
See for example, R. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
The Dormant Commerce Clause balancing test (the Pike v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:02 am
UK, Lee v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Subject v. object: is TM law descriptive or normative? [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:36 am
In S and Marper v UK 30562/04 [2008] ECHR 1581 (4 December 2008) one of the reasons given by the European Court of Human Rights for holding that the UK’s retention of innocent people’s DNA records on a criminal register infringed their right to privacy was the lack of sufficiently strong safeguards. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
As noted in Baker v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm
London Borough of Islington v Boyle & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1450This rather sad case was Islington’s appeal on the issue of whether Ms Boyle was occupying the flat she had under a secure tenancy as her ‘sole or principal home’. [read post]
