Search for: "People v. Driver" Results 161 - 180 of 4,413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
La note conceptuelle de l'événement de cette année et de plus amples informations sont disponibles sur le site web du Forum.Tous les acteurs concernés de toutes les régions sont invités à s’inscrire.INSCRIPTIONS OUVERTESParticipez au Forum pour partager des expériences et vous informer sur les dernières initiatives visant à promouvoir une conduite responsable des entreprises conformément… [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:05 am by Whitney Gravelle
However, this proposal has not received the consent of Indigenous Peoples, and raises its own environmental concerns. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:47 pm
Before trial, while in jail, the driver made a lot of phone calls, all of which were recorded. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 8:10 am by Alex Phipps
Defendant was the owner of the wrecked vehicle and there were no other people at the scene of the accident. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am by Dale Carpenter
A limousine driver may think he turns corners with a distinctive flair, but his craft is neither historically nor intrinsically expressive. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
The jury awarded the victim of the accident, who is Black, $9,200 in damages from the driver, who is white. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm by Sri Medicherla
Uriel-Charles discussed the 1960 Supreme Court case Gomillion v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
OFFICER’S TESTIMONY WAS INCONSISTENT WITH RECORDED EVIDENCEAfter the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County, suppressed certain physical evidence retrieved by, and statements made to, the police, the government appealed.On its review of the matter, the Appellate Term, First Department, not only deferred to the trial court’s credibility assessments, but found the record supported the judge’s determination that the available video evidence, from the officer’s… [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
A cab driver who is required to serve all passengers has no First Amendment right to refuse to take people who are visibly carrying Israeli merchandise. [read post]