Search for: "People v. Graves" Results 161 - 180 of 1,439
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am by Michael Oykhman
Cases such as R v Nygaard, 1989 CanLII 6 (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 1074, R v Jacquard, 1997 CanLII 374 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 314, and R v More, 1963 CanLII 805 (MBCA) have helped us establish notions of what “planned and deliberate” murder entails. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:06 pm by JURIST Staff
” In this regard, it is crucial to examine the judgment rendered in Rojer Mathew v South Indian Bank Ltd. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 5:55 am by Owiso Owiso
As the African Union Transitional Justice Policy (AUTJP) notes in paragraph 46(v), a fundamental benchmark for peace agreements is the inclusion of comprehensive provisions on justice, accountability, and reconciliation. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
” Not only do people enter with full knowledge but there is no charge. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by JURIST Staff
Hence, crimes relating to religion shall be dealt with diligently as they carries grave consequences. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 10:13 am by Tom Smith
”Alito’s draft opinion, arguing for overturning the two definitive precedents that for decades established a woman’s constitutional right to terminate her pregnancy – Roe v Wade and Planned Parenthood v Casey – was leaked to Politico, which published it on 2 May. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:38 am by Jennifer González
However, the precise definition of obscenity was unclear, and the Supreme Court would not rule that obscenity was not constitutionally protected speech until Roth v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
  Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito yesterday called the leak of his draft opinion overturning Roe v. [read post]
” Last month only, Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense discovered a grave-site containing more than 440 unmarked graves in the Izyum forest. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:05 am by Joseph Margulies
Habib, who is Australian, had been one of the four petitioners in Rasul v. [read post]