Search for: "People v. Hunt" Results 161 - 180 of 993
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2008, 5:53 pm
Like the baked chicken in the Supreme Court cafeteria that they serve on Mondays, the simple analysis based on original intent and plain meaning leaves people like Justice Scalia (not to mention his pal and sometimes hunting buddy Dick "shotgun in your face" Cheney ) so unsatisfied. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:00 am by Michelle Ghetti
In 2016 alone, 11.5 million people took 147 million trips to hunt within the United States, generating more than $27 billion in spending, nearly $2 billion in federal tax revenue and $1.6 billion in state and local tax revenue. [read post]
16 May 2019, 3:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
It's true that people who lawfully visit here for hunting or sporting purposes are exempted by subsection (y)(2), but many people don't so qualify. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am by Eric Goldman
What is more, the record shows that the Trustees hid or deleted negative comments from the Garniers that were not repetitive but did not similarly hide or delete positive comments from other people. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 6:24 pm by Mary Whisner
The nation’s sexual revolution of the 1960s fueled a social movement of people seeking repeal of sodomy laws, but it was not until the Supreme Court’s decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 12:09 pm by WIMS
When cones are scarce, the bears move closer to places where more people are. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 10:37 am by David Kopel
People who may need to defend themselves in a sudden emergency need to practice with the gun they will actually use. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 5:11 am by Asbestos Litigation
THE CONTRIBIO OF PEOPLES KAYAPS IN THE FORMATION OF OPEN PASTURE NAALDEIA GOTIRE IN THE SOUTH OF PAR. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 6:24 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
  The Sheika case recounts the three major opinions I know of on the subject: People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 6:20 pm by Christine Corcos
Military and militia references were more likely to appear in public discussions of the right to bear arms simply because they were more “newsworthy” than the mundane acts of ordinary people carrying a firearm for hunting or defense, which would rarely be recorded. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 6:20 pm
Military and militia references were more likely to appear in public discussions of the right to bear arms simply because they were more “newsworthy” than the mundane acts of ordinary people carrying a firearm for hunting or defense, which would rarely be recorded. [read post]