Search for: "People v. Justice"
Results 161 - 180
of 25,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2013, 3:18 pm
Justice Nicholson says yes.I would nonetheless pose one hypothetical to Justice Nicholson. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 6:01 am
We have a system of justice where people who are accused get due process, so it's just applying to this field what we have applied generally. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:30 am
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kansas v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 10:39 am
First, the Justices were unaware of the fact that many people were here illegally for a long period of time. [read post]
5 May 2022, 1:13 pm
CNN reported:Chief Justice John Roberts said Thursday that the leak of a draft opinion that would strike down Roe v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 9:37 pm
No, this was not the case people were waiting for. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 12:37 pm
But that's very much not the case here; COVID kills people, but in no universe does it end American democracy. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
Yesterday, in Gundy v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:51 pm
(People v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 10:09 am
But some people. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 2:22 pm
As long as people advocate originalism (and textualism), they will find Scalia symbolically useful. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
During these years, Radical Republicans, moderate Jeffersonian Republicans, Federalists, and the Supreme Court struggled to determine whether the meaning of the Constitution belonged to the people themselves, the people’s elected representatives, or the life-appointed justices ofthe Supreme Court.The same issue includes Aaron Knapp's The Legal Counterrevolution: The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Reform in 1787, which we noted as an SSRN paper. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm
Preach CT.The post Justice Thomas's Concurrence in <i>Alexander v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
The other categories of citizens, in terms of the Constitutional scheme, are Part III, Part IV, Article 311 and Part V. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:05 pm
I agree with Justice Perren that the prosecutor's extended reference to 9/11 in this case was error, and also thought that Justice Perren (rightly) took the underlying issue seriously.That said, the opinion highlights the problem of prosecutorial misconduct and the wholesale inability -- or unwillingness -- of the judiciary to do much about it. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 4:48 am
We could get Roe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:27 pm
The justices also agreed to take up Coinbase v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 10:32 am
James V. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 8:55 pm
With Roe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
That's a lot of m*****f***ing.First there was People v. [read post]
