Search for: "People v. Juvenile Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
Smith v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
This week, the Supreme Court found its replacement for Mathena v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 2:19 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:42 am
Young people cannot appear in the juvenile courts without legal representation. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:38 am
In one recent Long Island case, People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:03 am
At Final Decisions, Bryan Lammon thinks the court got it right on Wednesday when it held in Holguin-Hernandez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
New on the podcast: Black Lives Matter, a qualified immunity cert petition (Kelsay v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:01 am
The court made two observations in concluding the investigatory detention of the juveniles was improper. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 4:20 am
App. 354 (2008), the juvenile sold the victim Ecstasy. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 9:40 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
The Court of Appeal has previously held that you can't impose a criminal restitution penalty before you decide whether the would-be debtor has the ability to pay it; otherwise it's unnecessary (and useless) punishment.The Court of Appeal decides today -- in an opinion that's only six pages long (including the concurrence) -- that this principle doesn't apply to identical restitution penalties in juvenile cases.Two things about today's brief, but… [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 10:55 am
However, a careful reading of the Supreme Court of Virginia's opinion in Morrissey v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
People v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 12:30 pm
Espinoza v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 3:23 pm
On May 26, 2016, the Supreme Court issued its decision in People v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 2:46 am
In People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 2:25 pm
The Simon court explained its reasoning by citing to Dickerson v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:37 am
” The Supreme Court of Ohio in State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 9:08 am
The California Court of Appeal for the Second District said no in O.G. v. [read post]
