Search for: "People v. Keenan" Results 161 - 180 of 188
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2014, 11:05 am by mdkeenan
If you have questions about this or another related Illinois criminal, DUI or traffic matter, please contact Matt Keenan at 847-568-0160 or email matt@mattkeenanlaw.com.Resource: People v Ferris. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 12:27 pm by mdkeenan
In People v Cummings, police stopped a van driver because a check on the van’s expired license plate revealed that the owner had an outstanding arrest warrant. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by K.O. Herston
Related articles Transitional Alimony Lowered in Clarksville Divorce: Russell v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:49 am by David Markus
” The circuit judges followed with a ruling two weeks ago in the securities fraud case of United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:40 am
In Missouri under the case Keenan v Miriam Foundation, the Plaintiff does not have to establish prior violent crime if the Defendant assumed the duty to provide exterior security doors. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The European Court in M.S. v United Kingdom has not carved out a right to treatment; it has extended the right to be protected from indignity in detention that is already well-recognised in its jurisprudence (Keenan v United Kingdom). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:20 am by Karwan Eskerie
Reference was also made to Keenan v United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 38, where inadequate medical records, lack of recourse to specialist psychiatric input, segregation and punishment were found to amount to degrading treatment in respect of a mentally ill person. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by Matthew Hill
Subsequent case law has found that the duty might (depending on the facts of specific cases) apply to the following situations: prison authorities protecting inmates from harm from other prisoners [Edwards v UK (2002) 36 EHRR 487], or from suicide [Keenan v UK (2001) 33 EHRR 913]; immigrants in administrative detention [Slimani v France (2006) 43 EHRR 49]; military conscripts [Lilinc V Turkey (App. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:09 am
Quite how all these people will proceed without Legal Help I don't know. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:43 pm
A retrial of that case in June 2010 resulted in a plaintiff verdict, which was later reduced by Judge Keenan. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 12:01 pm by Aaref Hilaly
We realized on reading the Pavlik-Keenan Declaration (PK Declaration) that it contained many mis-statements. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm by Adam Wagner
Prisoners (as in Keenan v United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 913),conscripts (Álvarez Ramón v Spain (application no 51192/99) 3 July 2001) and mental patients (Herczegfalvy v Austria (1992) 15 EHRR 437) are in a different position because the deprivation of liberty imparts more responsibility on the authorities concerned to ensure that any consequent suicidal ideation is properly dealt with. [read post]