Search for: "People v. Laws (1993)" Results 161 - 180 of 1,821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2010, 12:27 pm by Greg Guedel
Under current federal law, Tribal courts can only hold jurisdiction over people who qualify as “Indian”. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:29 am
I’m glad people caught the error in Justice Scalia’s EPA v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” Third, the drug itself has harmed people. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 1:35 am by David Kopel
” Utah does not recognize common law marriage, so in Utah, just telling people that you are married cannot possibly confer the rights of civil marriage. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
As to the first, no privilege arose on the facts; and, even if one did, the interests of justice required that it be precluded (Smurfit Paribas Bank Ltd v AAB Export Finance Ltd [1990] 1 IR 469 (SC); Murphy v Kirwan [1993] 3 IR 501 (SC); Miley v Flood [2001] 1 ILRM 489, [2001] 2 IR 50, [2001] IEHC 9 (24 January 2001); Fyffes v DCC [2005] 1 IR 59 (SC), [2005] IESC 3 (27 January 2005) applied). [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Corp. (84 NY2d 488,492 [1994]) Matter of Russo v Nassau County Community Coll., 81 NY2d 690, 697 [1993]). [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm by Luke Rioux
Still, the court believed that the law required this result.Missouri v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:14 am by Michael Lowe
Bottom Line: All Too Often, You Have to Defend Yourself In Court After Bad Things Happen There are laws in place, both criminal laws and civil statutes, that exist solely to protect people from the police. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
They have provided legal arguments to the Court to show that international law requires states to not harm, and to not allow companies within their jurisdiction to harm, the human rights of people outside their borders. [read post]