Search for: "People v. Marks" Results 161 - 180 of 8,182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am by INFORRM
There are few things that people are more sensitive to than signs that two other people are in a relationship. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:51 am
There's a lot in here that I think we all can agree with. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:56 am
He sent me the following comment for posting:I wish the T.T.A.B. would stop saying that dilution of a mark can be shown merely by proving that the challenged mark causes people to think of the famous mark. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 11:31 am by Eric Goldman
Mark Lemley (Stanford Law) and I filed an amicus brief in 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 11:26 am by structuredsettlements
John Darer and Mark Wahlstrom covered the Hartford Life withdrawal on The Legal Broadcast Network on October 28, 2009 [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 2:35 am
The case of Target Australia Pty Ltd v Catchoftheday.com.au Pty Ltd [2015] ATMO 54, decided in June, aimed to answer this question in the fair land of Australia. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:50 am by James Yang
Step 1: Decide between a traditional patent marking or a virtual patent marking. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:04 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
By Mark Hays, Campaign Coordinator for Public Citizen’s Democracy is for People Campaign, which is building public support for a constitutional amendment that would address the impact of Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am by Dennis Crouch
  Some however, were blocked or cancelled (including the Washington Redskins mark) on that basis before the Supreme Court held the bar unconstitutional in Matal v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:13 am by rstokes
v=_ymbv-Z5KRk The post AbleGamers: breaking down barriers for people with disabilities appeared first on Michigan Birth Injury & HIE Attorneys. [read post]