Search for: "People v. Port" Results 161 - 180 of 780
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
”11 As a result, CBPOne appointments were temporarily suspended for the Laredo port of entry. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 3:53 pm by Lysander Johnson
The next ferry under construction is M/V SAMISH, due to start service in early 2015. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:16 am
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal PracticeDefendant Granted Dismissal of Charges; Prosecutors Exceed 90-Day CPL §30.30(1) Period People v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 6:31 am by Don Asher
  They deserve protection and respect on the job which is often infuriatingly lacking when employers choose to place profits over people. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 12:05 pm by Paul M. Hauge
Hess involves a property in the Port Reading section of Woodbridge historically operated as an oil refinery and terminal. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 1:14 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Employment Sarbanes-Oxley Act Whistleblower Suit Dismissed; Disclosures Insufficiently Related to Shareholder Fraud Portes v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Kevin Russell
Village of Port Chester (2007); Goldstein v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 8:01 am by Katrina Eiland
The first bans anyone who entered the U.S. between ports of entry, even though U.S. laws state that it does not matter how a person enters if they are fleeing danger. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
The court’s landmark decision in NAACP v Claiborne Hardware Co. affirmed the constitutional right of NAACP activists to hold a mass economic boycott of white-owned businesses in Port Gibson, Mississippi, to protest the community’s persistent racial inequality and segregation. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The post GWU Law Student Gov't Directs People to Stop Saying/Writing "Illegal," "Alien," and "Assimilation" re: Immigration appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
 He also noted that, adecade before Riley, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the Government's historical right to search without a warrant people and property crossing the border into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:09 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITAntitrust Distributor's Claims Did Not Show Supplier's Vertical Expansion, Refusal to Deal to Be Anticompetitive Port Dock & Stone Corp. v. [read post]