Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 161 - 180
of 5,232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
There's simply no reason at all to think that the 2017 Congress believed that anyone (no reasonable person, anyway) would purchase unwanted insurance because of a "sense of legal obligation" engendered by the 2017 statutory amendment.But even if there were some such unreasonable people out there (such as, perhaps, the individual plaintiffs in the case) who mistakenly read the amended Section 5000A to require them to purchase insurance, those… [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 5:19 am
Although Article V, in principle, acknowledges the role of the people as the ultimate arbiters of constitutional meaning, it makes it difficult for the people to do so because its stringent requirements render electoral supremacy virtually impossible. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
If McCulloch v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
See, also, Delgrande v Greenville Fire Dist., 126 AD3d 968 and Perfetto v Erie Co. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:41 pm
An individual may have an odor of alcohol but not be intoxicated or impaired within the legal definition as held in People v Miller and Mulvean v Fox. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:32 pm
” But sometimes Marks is difficult to apply; Baze v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 8:30 am
In Sanchez v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 6:01 pm
In People v Belliard (2013 NY Slip Op 00884 [NY 2/12/13]), the Court of Appeals held that Courtsare not required to advise a defendant pleading guilty that it is mandatory that the sentence of imprisonment he will receive as a second felony offender will run consecutively to the undischarged portion of his previously imposed state sentence. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
Koenderman rendered a decision in People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:21 pm
The post Utah v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:21 pm
The post Utah v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The index assists the readers in pinpointing specific points of law along with the people or parties involved. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:53 am
In a strange but true “premises liability”action, that very question was before the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Judicial District (Lorain County) in the case of Graham v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
In a 4-3 decision covering a pair of cases, People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:30 am
There were about 50 people in all. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:30 am
There were about 50 people in all. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
Taking its decision in People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
As to the distinction between policy and implementation, it is somewhat surprising that the absence of a bright line should be thought to render an otherwise reasonable distinction unworkable. [read post]
