Search for: "People v. Sherman" Results 161 - 180 of 512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:40 am
As was explained in Sherman, . . . [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:49 am by boston
”Americans United filed a friend-of-the-court brief in this case, Sherman v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:04 pm by Katherine Pompilio
The Supreme Court has voted to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:08 am
HIIT Peloton classes and our fav teachers Hanna Frankson and Jen Sherman on the bike and Daniel McKenna for strength. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
At the Associated Press, Mark Sherman reports that oral argument tomorrow in Benisek v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court to strike down a new Mississippi law that lets government workers and business people cite their own religious objections to refuse services to LGBT people. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:25 am by Maxwell Kennerly
For example, just because several products or services are being sold in a manner that demonstrates collusion among the suppliers doesn't make it "plausible" there is such collusion, said the Supreme Court in Twombly v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
High court should step in against law regulating speech regarding ballot measures by small, low-budget groups [John Kramer, Institute for Justice on Justice v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
Sherman, a 2007 decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal, provides that a settlement agreement is a contract, and as such is subject to the general laws of contract. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 5:32 pm by Howard Bashman
” Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that “Supreme Court could limit execution of people with dementia. [read post]