Search for: "People v. Smith (1983)" Results 161 - 180 of 193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am by David Kris
 Microsoft’s Chief Legal Officer, Brad Smith, testified in Congress in February, asking the House Judiciary Committee to “[i]magine the kind of meeting that I have had to have with a Brazilian employee [of Microsoft] who is being prosecuted [for refusing to comply with Brazilian law]. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm by Pace Law School Library
Land seizures in the People’s Republic of China: protecting property while encouraging economic development. 22 Pac. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by Jon McLaughlin
Only in 1983 did the General Assembly amend Section 401(a) to add the 90-days-before-filing alternative (see Section 401(a), Supplement to Historical and Practice Notes, Ill.Ann.Stat. ch. 40, ¶ 401 (Smith-Hurd 1985 pocket part)). [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
  The new school of political economy that he created at the University of Virginia was “meant to train a new generation of thinkers to push back against Brown [v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Approximately 2,000 people are hospitalized, and 60 people die as a direct result of E. coli O157:H7 infections and complications. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I relied in part on an anecdote involving a visit by Justice Scalia to the University of Texas and and his clear lack of interest in what his friend and former colleague Doug Laycock planned to publish in the Supreme Court Review about his opinion in the “peyote case,” Smith v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm by Bexis
  It invites juries to decide cases on improper bases – that all these people wouldn’t be suing unless something was wrong. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
  To put it in perspective, my group at the University of Toronto was working on multi-touchin 1984 (Lee, Buxton & Smith, 1985), the same year that the first Macintosh computer was released, and we were not the first. [read post]