Search for: "People v. Smith (1990)" Results 161 - 180 of 393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2013, 2:16 pm by Dale Carpenter
Smith (1990) over whether a “hybrid” (e.g., a free exercise + free speech) claim might trigger greater judicial scrutiny.) (3)  The state Religious Freedom Restoration Act does not apply. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
There has been an epic battle over the scope of religious liberty since 1990 when the Supreme Court decided Employment Division v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 8:22 am by Eugene Volokh
From 1963 to 1990, the Court read the Free Exercise Clause as requiring this as to all federal, state, and local government action; it changed course in the Employment Division v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Goes back at least to White-Smith Music; also occurred in video game cases. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Timmerman-Cooper    Southern District of Ohio at ColumbusJULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Canada Mazhar v Farooqi 2020 ONSC 3490 – Successful anti SLAPP motion under section 137.1 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Whereas Rodney King expressed the desire to overcome the racial divisions that scar American society, these essays that Sandy wrote in the early 1990s were focused on the problem of religious division.[2] More precisely, they examined the divide that exists between what Sandy described as “secularist, accommodationist liberals like myself”[3]and “those who are religious. [read post]