Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 161 - 180
of 6,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2011, 11:53 am
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s the opinion in People v. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 2:27 am
So a cheating spouse need not be awarded any less solely on that fact. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:16 am
See, e.g., The Law Practice of Alexander Hamilton: Documents and Commentary 811 (Julius Goebel ed. 1981) (reprinting Alexander Hamilton’s defense argument in People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 5:31 pm
The materials are offensive to many people, and because they feel so strongly, many will judge the defendant based solely on an accusation. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 1:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:46 pm
Now, in Holt v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:11 am
Prigg v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 1:17 pm
People are exhausted. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 8:14 pm
The one fortunate aspect of the case is that Australia is not one of those jurisdictions in which incorrect recording of inventorship or ownership is, in itself, fatal to the validity or enforceablity of a patent.In this case, the court has now ordered (Neobev Pty Ltd v Bacchus Distillery Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (No 4) [2014] FCA 21) that the Register of Patents be rectified to show Mr Scott as sole inventor. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:21 am
In a recent opinion in People v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
In the year after Plessy v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:21 am
Adler v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:57 am
Roberts tries to argue that this case is different because Korematsu relocated people “solely and explicitly on the basis of race. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
I’ve blogged before about people getting injunctions against alleged libelers, aimed solely at getting Google to deindex the allegedly libelous page. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm
It's been about two years, so I guess it was about time to write about Oracle v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:32 pm
The trial court said no, and the Fourth Department held that the record supports the court's determination (the Court wrote that on this issue one should see generally People v Glover, 87 NY2d 838; People v Fridman, 71 NY2d 845; People v Hicks, 69 NY2d 969, rearg denied 70 NY2d 796; People v Dehmler, 188 AD2d 1056, lv denied 81 NY2d 1013). [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:56 pm
Over and over Rundle and her minions abandon the trust placed in them by the people of Miami-Dade County to make the fair but unpopular decisions that prosecutors are supposed to make. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 10:15 am
People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:47 pm
If the testimony is so inherently unreliable, then courts and juries should be prohibited from relying solely on such testimony to convict people. [read post]
