Search for: "People v. Standard (1986)"
Results 161 - 180
of 644
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
On 13 September the Press Gazette had a piece “Government won’t appeal ruling which stopped full probe into Saudi investments in Standard and independent”. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
(Hodgins v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Many religious people are understandably upset when they have to subsidize blasphemy. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
Yero v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 3:02 pm
In Watts v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
We draw attention to the following from the Media Communications List 19 July 2019,ARN v OSD, Nicklin J 18 July 2019, JKL v VBN, Garnham J Last Week in the Courts On 22 July 2019 Warby J hear a default judgment application in the case of Advertising Standards Authority v Mitchell, handing down judgment the same day [2019] EWHC 1958 (QB). [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 1:35 pm
I represented a group of political scientists as friends of the Court in a 1986 case. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:46 am
Supreme Court made this finding for the first time in a 1986 decision, Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:42 am
” Instead, the court characterized the ruling as a fairly straightforward application of the Supreme Court’s 1986 ruling in Batson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 5:30 am
Public Health England, the Food Standards Agency (FSA) and the NHS confirmed that, following a retrospective analysis of Listeria cases that 9 cases including 5 deaths were linked to this Listeria outbreak. [read post]
27 May 2019, 10:16 am
E.E.O.C. v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:58 am
INS v. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 10:37 am
All states have regulations requiring health care providers to report cases of listeriosis and public health officials try to interview all persons with listeriosis promptly using a standard questionnaire about high risk foods. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
The ICWA and the federal regulations explicitly state that Awhere applicable State or other Federal law provides a higher standard of protection to the rights of the parent or Indian custodian than the protection accorded under the Act, ICWA requires the State or Federal court to apply the higher State or Federal standard@ (25 CFR 23.106; see 25 USC ' 1921). [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:06 pm
You can add this deduction to your standard deduction if you don’t itemize, or if you choose, you can add it to you itemized deductions. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:13 pm
(Ms Hacio had worked for the City for 42 years and had been the General Manager from 1986 until retirement in 2002. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 6:49 am
” See People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Nette.[67] The case involved the rephrasing of the standard of causation for culpable homicide set out in R. v. [read post]
