Search for: "People v. Treat" Results 161 - 180 of 9,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2016, 10:33 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
The attitude behind this hard Brexit concept was reflected in Prime Minister Theresa May’s speech at the Conservative Party conference in late September: “[t]oo many people in positions of power behave as though they have more in common with international elites than with the people down the road, the people they employ, the people they pass in the street. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:56 am by Ben
One would think that Shields has a good case that the uses constitute "fair use" - not least from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Bill Graham Archives v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am by JB
Because so many powerful and influential people made these arguments, mainstream media felt compelled to treat them as serious legal claims and this also helped support their reasonableness.The composition of the federal bench also matters, because an argument is more likely to be thought plausible, and possibly succeed, if many federal judges are likely to entertain it and take it seriously.Let's apply this analysis to Texas v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
In all 39 people between the ages of 14 and 21 were treated and released. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
In all 39 people between the ages of 14 and 21 were treated and released. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:52 am
.], because you didn't treat me like everybody else -- some other realtors. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 12:09 pm
  You be the judge.It's a case about whether the BIA properly evaluated changed circumstances in Indonesia, which in turn required the Ninth Circuit to decide if evangelical Christians were treated worse than different minority religions in Indonesia. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:41 pm
An individual may have an odor of alcohol but not be intoxicated or impaired within the legal definition as held in People v Miller and Mulvean v Fox. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” Justice Kavanagh also put forth a replacement test under which the Establishment Clause is not violated “if the challenged government practice is not coercive and if it (i) is rooted in history and tradition; or (ii) treats religious people, organizations, speech, or activity equally to comparable secular people, organizations, speech, or activity; or (iii) represents a permissible legislative accommodation or exemption from a generally applicable… [read post]