Search for: "People v. Watson"
Results 161 - 180
of 371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2008, 9:08 am
Corn Exchange LLC
NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice
Defendants Lack Standing to Move to Controvert Second Search Warrant Executed on Premises
People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 6:36 am
The style of the case is, Monk v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 8:02 am
Superior Court of Los Angeles County (Watson) (1975) 13 Cal.3d 652, 658; Elrod v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:02 pm
People v Watson, 1627, 3735/07, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 8947; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 1:38 pm
Hawaii v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:49 am
Watson was an Assistant U.S. [read post]
12 May 2009, 3:48 am
In State v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:55 pm
Watson (1956) 46 Cal.2d 818, or Chapman v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Baze v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:10 am
Watson: it’s not just bad actors involved. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:24 pm
Granting plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order in Hawaii v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
Watson. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:06 pm
In re Anthony,414 F.2d 1383 (CCPA 1969) (FDA, not USPTO, is responsible for safety ofdrugs which are sought to be patented); In re Watson, 517 F.2d 465 (CCPA1975) (Congress has given responsibility to FDA, not USPTO, to determinein the first instance whether drugs are safe); Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:47 pm
The case, Dennis Hopkins v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 6:20 am
Common falls can have an unpredictable impact on the bodies of older people. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:09 pm
” Opinion at 17 (citing Lujan v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
Thankfully, while Tom Watson blocks libel reform on the grounds that Parliament needs more time (Infra), the Court of Appeal has stepped in to bring a degree of sanity into libel proceedings in BCA v Dr Singh. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
IPKat has a post on the China’s image rights and the threshold for protection of the right to likeness following the publication of the nine “Typical civil cases of judicial protection of personality rights after the promulgation of the Civil Code of China” from the Supreme People’s Court of China. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Pathologizing people’s justifiable anger at having no meaningful access to court is not useful. [read post]