Search for: "Person v. Person" Results 161 - 180 of 123,018
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2013, 1:51 pm
Check out the below Arbitration Appeal review of Delegate Lawrence Blackman of the Financial Services Commission on Ontario in Christopher Hoang v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:35 am
Southern Pacific Personal Loans Ltd v Walker and another [2009] EWCA Civ 1176 ; [2009] WLR (D) 333 "A credit broker’s administration fee entered into the 'charge for credit' and did not form part of the total 'amount of credit' for the purposes of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, even though payment of the fee was [...] [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:34 am by Holger Hembach
In Colon v The Netherlands, the European Court of Human Rights has scrutinized laws authorizing the search of persons without reasonable suspicion in light of article 8 ECHR.Pursuant to Dutch law, the mayor (Burgomaster) may designate certain areas as ‘security risk area’ for a limited time. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 2:15 pm by Ron Friedmann
Like a choice of PC v Mac, this tends to be highly personal. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
In Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd and others v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty and others [2014] EWHC 3429 the court granted interim and final injunctions to restrain harassment against a class of unknown persons (in that case animal rights protestors) specified only by a general description (that is “persons who are conducting or may conduct protesting and/or unlawful activities against the claimants”). [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
This engaged a raft of caselaw, including his recent decision in LJY v Persons Unknown [2017] EWHC 3230. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 1:08 pm by pgbarnes
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled on Oct. 6, 2010 in the case of Vera v. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 1:55 pm by familoo
It’s not very long so I set out 46.5 in full below. (1) This rule applies where the court orders (whether by summary assessment or detailed assessment) that the costs of a litigant in person are to be paid by any other person. (2) The costs allowed under this rule will not exceed, except in the case of a disbursement, two-thirds of the amount which would have been allowed if the litigant in person had been represented by a legal representative. (3) The litigant in… [read post]