Search for: "Peters v. District of Columbia"
Results 161 - 180
of 246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
The following is our monthly featured post from Terry Nelson, Peter Fetzer and Michael Primo of Foley & Lardner filling you in on the latest developments in the world of investment management. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:31 am
District for the District of Columbia against certain individual officers and directors of the now defunct Carlyle Capital Corp. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 4:28 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Jan. 12, 1987), federal district courts held that the rule precluded pharmacist liability. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:25 am
The attorneys general in all 50 states and the District of Columbia charged that NCC was using improper collection tactics and making inaccurate reports to credit-reporting agencies. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:29 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that was hearing the case, Hamdan v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Swerdlow, M.D., Robert V. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
(Copyright Litigation Blog) Columbia law expert on telecom, copyright to FTC (IP Watch) US Copyright – Decisions District Court C D California confirms no fair use exception to digital lock provisions under the DMCA: USA v Matthew Crippen (IP Osgoode) District Court E D Texas: Another Texas judge scrutinises mass copyright litigation: Steve Hardeman LLC v. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 5:01 am
For additional guidance on the reverse contingency fee, see District of Columbia Bar Ethics Committee Op. 347 (2009) (finding that reverse contingency fee is not prohibited; dissent would require a written explanation of how the lawyer and client estimate the client's exposure, but majority required only an oral explanation); Jim O. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
No. 08 Civ. 7810 (LTS)(JCF).United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
Unlike the District of Columbia, where you can be fined for showing people where the Constitution is (Todd Henderson, Truth on the Market), the blogosphere allows me to serve as your meagerly-paid tour guide to the best of the blawgs. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:02 pm
Barry, which considered a District of Columbia statute prohibiting protests within 500 feet of diplomatic facilities. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am
(This is the classic nuisance case of Spur Industries v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
