Search for: "Petition of Reed"
Results 161 - 180
of 609
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
He submits the letter could interrogate the contents of the letter, he refers to Lord Reed’s comments that it is important to read the memos produced. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
He says Parliament may be prorogued for a number of purposes. 14:26: Lord Reed and Lady Arden question Lord Keen QC regarding procedural steps the Government would take in the event that prorogation is declared unlawful by the Court. 14:21: Lord Keen QC submits that “in any view” part 4 of the Interlocuter (the Inner Court’s order) must be recalled. 14:19 Lord Keen QC argues that in so far as the Inner House sought to declare the prorogation unlawful, he will take no issue… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:30 am
Lona Hills Ranch, LLC (No. 18-0656) TCPA • Free Speech • Right To Petition [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
That motion was refused and the petition itself was also refused by a judge in the Outer House. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 2:52 pm
Reed Smith’s labor attorneys will keep you apprised of further developments and are available to assist you with all of your labor needs. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 11:29 am
The petitions of the week are: Michigan v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Calvernia Reed was not named in the petition, but she was included as a plaintiff in the body of the petition as Geneva’s then-current guardian. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
The statute: (a) Except as provided under subsection (b) of this section, a public entity shall not: (1) Enter into a contract with a company to acquire or dispose of services, supplies, information technology, or construction unless the contract includes a written certification that the person or company is not currently engaged in, and agrees for the duration of the contract not to engage in, a boycott of Israel; or (2) Engage in boycotts of Israel. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:10 am
Oracle America Inc., a cert petition involving whether copyright protection extends to software interfaces, “the Supreme Court [would] have to look closely at exactly what an application program interface is. [read post]
6 May 2019, 10:35 am
(Reed Smith represented Armslist in connection with its successful petition for discretionary review in that Court.) [read post]
6 May 2019, 10:35 am
(Reed Smith represented Armslist in connection with its successful petition for discretionary review in that Court.) [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 4:59 pm
The superior court denied the petitions, and the unions challenged the ruling in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 4:59 pm
The superior court denied the petitions, and the unions challenged the ruling in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 10:41 am
Thus, "If you can show that these possibilities are unlikely to occur, discuss this in your petition. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
By Mark S. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:40 am
Reed. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
Petitions for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania were denied. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The appointing authority adopted the hearing officer's findings and recommendation and terminated Thomas' employment, whereupon Thomas filed a petition pursuant Article 78 of the CPLR seeking a judicial review of the Town's action.The Appellate Division dismissed Thomas' appeal, explaining that any credibility issues were resolved by the hearing officer (see Matter of Reed v Raynor, 151 AD3d 730), and substantial evidence in the record supported the… [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The appointing authority adopted the hearing officer's findings and recommendation and terminated Thomas' employment, whereupon Thomas filed a petition pursuant Article 78 of the CPLR seeking a judicial review of the Town's action.The Appellate Division dismissed Thomas' appeal, explaining that any credibility issues were resolved by the hearing officer (see Matter of Reed v Raynor, 151 AD3d 730), and substantial evidence in the record supported the… [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
On 24 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
