Search for: "Pillars v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2019, 2:50 pm
Amount B The second category in the Secretariat’s proposal on Pillar 1 is Amount B. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 7:34 am
What makes this case so fascinating is that the Court has never before held, or even been asked to consider, whether the states may abolish traditional pillars of criminal law like the insanity defense. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:43 am
In Maddox v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
The prerogative can go from declaring war to giving honours to proroguing parliament – none having much to do with each other at all. 1428: Aidan O’Neill QC confirms he is now turning to the substantive issues in his submissions (after comment from Lady Hale). 1425: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the four pillars of the state and the UKSC’s role in adjudicating. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:03 am
Tillis's efforts to distance himself from (at least) the proposed overruling of the eBay v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
Aidan O’Neill QC argues that following the case of Andy Wightman MSP and others v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU it is clear that the Article 50 notification can be withdrawn at any time. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:34 am
Consequently, the appellate court remanded the case to the trial court to allow it to reconsider this award (4 Pillar Dynasty LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am
Later, the Court of Justice of the EU brought a bit more balance into that analysis with its Huawei v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am
He refers to R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, noting it is consistent with the UK Government position. 1449: David Johnston QC refers to the Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011 in accordance with which dissolution must take place. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 11:12 am
" United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am
First, the Council confirmed that everyone has a right to quality and inclusive education, training and lifelong learning in accordance with the terms of the European Pillar of Social Rights (‘EPSR’).[9] Second, a high share of young people, in particular, continue to lack basic skills, such as literacy and numerical skills.[10] Third, a revision of the Recommendation had been envisaged in the New Skills Agenda for Europe previously.[11] Finally, the advent of the EPSR,… [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 10:15 am
More SESTA/FOSTA-Related Posts: * Section 230 Doesn’t End Lawsuit Claiming Facebook Facilitated Sex Trafficking–Doe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:13 pm
A pillar of the contemporary conservative movement is hostility to the separation of church and state. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
Is the attorney-client privilege one of the pillars of a global right to practice? [read post]
22 May 2019, 5:57 am
R2P has three pillars. [read post]
20 May 2019, 7:30 am
Second, other courts are not recognizing the privilege whatsoever.Attorney-client privilege is a pillar of the legal system that is entrenched throughout the United States. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:30 pm
Lenora was a pillar of the ACLU. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am
Meanwhile, a proposal to break up California into three states nearly made it onto the ballot last November. [read post]
