Search for: "Plaintiff 2" Results 161 - 180 of 56,731
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2015, 1:55 pm by jason
For plaintiffs currently in litigation, one ill-advised status update can have a negative impact on their settlement or verdict. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:37 am by Andrew Frisch
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2) and the common practice in this District requires the court to establish an appropriate fee after the Plaintiff has prevailed at trial. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:41 am by Brittany E. Grierson
As such, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(C), which provides that when a party fails to act in accordance with its discovery obligations “the court must order the disobedient party . . . to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, caused by the failure,” and with the court’s inherent powers, the court imposed sanctions on plaintiff for his egregious conduct and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:41 am by Brittany E. Grierson
As such, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(C), which provides that when a party fails to act in accordance with its discovery obligations “the court must order the disobedient party . . . to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, caused by the failure,” and with the court’s inherent powers, the court imposed sanctions on plaintiff for his egregious conduct and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:41 am by Brittany E. Grierson
As such, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(C), which provides that when a party fails to act in accordance with its discovery obligations “the court must order the disobedient party . . . to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, caused by the failure,” and with the court’s inherent powers, the court imposed sanctions on plaintiff for his egregious conduct and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 4:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Family Lawyer said that, plaintiff seeks an order 1) granting Plaintiff leave of Court to voluntarily discontinue the Instant Action without prejudice; or, alternatively, 2) consolidating this action with the Kings County Action; 3) determining the appropriate venue in which these two actions should be litigated; and 4) granting certain injunctive relief. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:52 pm
This case was before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Decertify the class (stage 2). [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:34 pm by Aimee Czachorowski
The Court granted the Objectors’ motion, and discussed the eight factors it considers to assess whether a proposed derivative plaintiff will adequately represent the class: Factors to Determine Adequacy of Plaintiff (1) economic antagonisms between the representative and the class; (2) the remedy sought by plaintiff in the derivative litigation; (3) indications that the named plaintiff was not the driving force behind the litigation; (4)… [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:06 pm
Plaintiff objects to the conviction evidence. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:06 pm
Plaintiff objects to the conviction evidence. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:06 pm
Plaintiff objects to the conviction evidence. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:06 pm
Plaintiff objects to the conviction evidence. [read post]