Search for: "Points v. Points" Results 161 - 180 of 90,624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm by John Nielsen
This past year, I chose two trademark cases: Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Constitution.Background/Plaintiffs’ Claims in Thompson V. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 9:05 pm
Swanlane Estates Ltd v Woods and others LRX/159/2007 (.pdf) This case concerns the not uncommon situation of a court or tribunal (in this case, a Leasehold Valuation Tribunal) taking a point which the applicant / claimant had not expressly pleaded and the respondent / defendant then losing the case on that very point. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 4:26 am by David DePaolo
In my mind the OIEC reports are not conclusive, and as I point out, raise more questions than they answer. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm by Jeff Gamso
Bond, like any other defendant, has a personal right not to be convicted under a constitutionally invalid law.Bond v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 8:43 am by CMS
Orthodox Approach v Glanzstoff Approach The UKSC favoured the orthodox approach which is long established: liquidated damages apply to delay up to the point of termination following which the employer is entitled to make a claim for general damages. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:59 am
 Maybe those extra 5 percentage points of difference in the poll between May and June are people who don't want responsibility for creating new abortion rights — getting statutes passed. [read post]
1 May 2009, 7:00 am
See also California Labor Code §  1171.5;  Reyes v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
Even still, a court may not “presuppose an arbitrary or false starting point. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:28 pm
CAAF today affirmed the Coast Guard Court's ruling in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 4:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: South Point Brief.pdfDownload State Brief.pdfDownload Tribal Amicus Brief.pdfDownload Prior post here. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:16 am by Docket Navigator
The court denied defendants' motion for summary judgment of invalidity because defendant failed to show that plaintiff’s tunneling client access point patent was directed toward an abstract idea. [read post]