Search for: "Powell v. Thomas" Results 161 - 180 of 304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2015, 7:22 am by Mark Ashton
 As I read the dissents I kept thinking about the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments George  v Cannell, heard on 14 June 2022 (Underhill V-P, Warby and Snowden LLJ) The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspaper [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:03 pm
The current Supreme Court has at least two members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 1:36 pm by Adam Schlossman
Commission on Civil Rights and present professor at the University of San Diego Law School Podcast: with David Stras, law professor at the University of Minnesota, on his experience clerking for Justice Clarence Thomas “What Powell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
The result of respecting "private preferences" was essentially to lock in the status quo.In 1968, the Supreme Court, in Green v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Richard Primus
 Only in the 1940s did Chief Justice Stone resuscitate the nationalist use of McCulloch, with assists from historians Thomas Reed Powell and Charles Beard. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Brian R. Frazelle
The majority also claimed its work was already done by 1968’s Powell v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Thomas, joined by Judges Stephen Powell and Matthew Byrne: Ehlers is the director of the Montgomery County Coroner's Office ("MCCO"). [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
A certain kind of original-intent theory was self-defeating if Powell's historical analysis was correct. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
A certain kind of original-intent theory was self-defeating if Powell's historical analysis was correct. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:01 am
All parties favoured the exploration of other solutions in addition to patent law.

 Amandine Métier (Véron & Associés), Thomas Misgaiski (HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER) and Vittorio Cerulli Irelli (Trevisan Cuonzo) had the pleasure of being joined by Judge Peter Blok of the Court of Appeal in The Hague to explore the CJEU's ruling on Huawei v ZTE, the national aftermath and the Judge's perspective. [read post]