Search for: "Powers v. Planned Parenthood" Results 161 - 180 of 440
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2020, 9:48 am by Amy Howe
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, back to the lower courts for another look after the justices’ ruling on Monday in June Medical Services v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
At ACS’ Expert Forum blog, Caroline Mala Corbin explains that, like Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm by Jane S. Schacter
Justice Stephen Breyer’s majority opinion in Whole Woman’s Health held that the Texas law constituted an “undue burden” on access to abortion in violation of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:10 am by Payton Smith
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky condemned the anti-abortion actions of the Kentucky legislators, expressing that the bills passed by the House “have one goal in mind: to bring a direct challenge to Roe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Mary Ziegler
Under Roe, state laws banning or restrictively regulating abortion were invalid.After two decades of backlash and maneuvering by the anti-abortion movement (including violence against clinics and providers), the Court revisited Roe in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 5:28 am by Daniel Klapper
Women are just trying to survive this crisis,” said acting President and CEO of Planned Parenthood, Alexis McGill Johnson. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(emphasis added)This one little passage is big, because it represents the first time a majority of the Court has invoked this stare decisis requirement of a “special justification” – above and beyond the wrongness of a prior decision – in a constitutional setting since Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am by Jackie McDermott
   In deciding that case, the Court reaffirmed the “undue burden” standard—that abortion laws should not place an undue burden on women seeking a legal abortion—set by Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For example, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Planned Parenthood, and Justice Thomas opinion focusing on abortion as eugenics; Supreme Court's granting of certiorari on Louisiana's abortion law; increasingly restrictive enactments by various states; and challenges to new HHS health care conscience rules.Supreme Court's decision in American Legion v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 9:09 am by ACLU
My mom was a feminist and a stay-at-home mom who took me to political rallies, and I used to babysit for a mom who worked at Planned Parenthood. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
As we hope to demonstrate in “Democracy and Equality,” in our view, although the justices of the Warren Court often confronted problematic precedents, they had a deep understanding of the most fundamental reasons for judicial review and of the essential role of our Supreme Court in our constitutional system – most centrally, to make sure that majorities do not disregard the rights and interests of those without the political power to protect themselves, or abuse their… [read post]