Search for: "Powers v. Planned Parenthood"
Results 161 - 180
of 434
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2020, 6:10 am
” Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky condemned the anti-abortion actions of the Kentucky legislators, expressing that the bills passed by the House “have one goal in mind: to bring a direct challenge to Roe v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
A couple of decades later, in Jacobson v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
Under Roe, state laws banning or restrictively regulating abortion were invalid.After two decades of backlash and maneuvering by the anti-abortion movement (including violence against clinics and providers), the Court revisited Roe in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 5:28 am
Women are just trying to survive this crisis,” said acting President and CEO of Planned Parenthood, Alexis McGill Johnson. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
(emphasis added)This one little passage is big, because it represents the first time a majority of the Court has invoked this stare decisis requirement of a “special justification” – above and beyond the wrongness of a prior decision – in a constitutional setting since Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:36 pm
Wade (1973) (citing Jacobson); Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:37 pm
The plurality opinion in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
V Dean E. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:33 pm
See Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am
In deciding that case, the Court reaffirmed the “undue burden” standard—that abortion laws should not place an undue burden on women seeking a legal abortion—set by Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
For example, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Planned Parenthood, and Justice Thomas opinion focusing on abortion as eugenics; Supreme Court's granting of certiorari on Louisiana's abortion law; increasingly restrictive enactments by various states; and challenges to new HHS health care conscience rules.Supreme Court's decision in American Legion v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 9:09 am
My mom was a feminist and a stay-at-home mom who took me to political rallies, and I used to babysit for a mom who worked at Planned Parenthood. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
As we hope to demonstrate in “Democracy and Equality,” in our view, although the justices of the Warren Court often confronted problematic precedents, they had a deep understanding of the most fundamental reasons for judicial review and of the essential role of our Supreme Court in our constitutional system – most centrally, to make sure that majorities do not disregard the rights and interests of those without the political power to protect themselves, or abuse their… [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:00 pm
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-1019, is no longer being relisted and it appears the court is holding it for the Louisiana admitting-privileges case, June Medical Services LLC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:59 am
Klobuchar also expressed the desire to “fund [Planned Parenthood] again,” while Booker and Castro both said they would repeal the Hyde Amendment, which bars the use of federal funding for abortion. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
See Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:09 am
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-1019Issue: Whether a state, consistent with the 14th Amendment, may require an ultrasound as part of informed consent at least 18 hours before an abortion. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
Perhaps his change of heart really arose from a sudden new understanding of congressional taxing power (248). There seems to be no good answer. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
