Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 161 - 180 of 49,382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2015, 4:01 pm
” In recent years, since the 2005 Supreme Court decision of Kelo v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 5:18 pm by Rob Robinson
A Definition and FrameworkSource: ComplexDiscovery The post The Power of V? [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:46 am by sally
Morrison Sports Ltd and others v Scottish Power UK plc [2010] UKSC 37; [2010] WLR (D) 202 “A person who suffered loss as a result of a breach of statutory duty did not have a private right of action for damages when there was statutory provision for other forms of enforcement of the duty on behalf of the public. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Saumya Singh (National Law School of India University) has posted The Meld Model, Rent, and the Constitutional Separation of Powers in India: Building on the case for Taking Statutes Seriously in Indian Corporate Law Adjudication (GNLU Student Law Review, Volume V (2024), pp 1-33) on SSRN. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:27 am by Steven M. Taber
Thus, there are at least three distinctions to be made between American Electric Power and North Carolina v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 7:36 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Supreme Court ruled today in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm by David Doniger
Electric power companies support EPA regulation of their industry’s carbon pollution. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 9:15 am by Elizabeth Reese
ShareIn its first major opinion on the scope of American Indian tribes’ sovereign powers in decades, the Supreme court held on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
The Seventh Circuit explained that the states’ and FERC’s powers under the Federal Power Act often overlap; it would be impossible for states to regulate the local distribution of electricity without at least affecting the price of power within its borders. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” The post Executive Power Under Dames & Moore v Regan appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 3:44 pm by Rick Hills
The reason is that the judges’ arguments against mandated vaccination apply pretty much as well to mandated childbirth: If forcing someone to get vaccinated is the exercise of a “great power” not to be inferred from the Necessary & Proper clause under NFIB v Sebelius, then surely forcing someone to carry a pregnancy to term is equally “great” and in the... [read post]