Search for: "Price v. Age, Ltd." Results 161 - 180 of 243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The Daily Mail’s counsel, Jonathan Caplan, argued that the paper’s data requests outlined in the ‘What Price Privacy Now‘ report (2006) were legal. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am by Melina Padron
Quila & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45 (12 October 2011) October 13, 2011 – our post here Home Secretary’s refusal to grant visas to non-resident spouses under a certain age breached their right to family life under Article 8 of the Convention. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:01 pm by lawshucks
The closing price for Global common stock on September 9 was $5.15 per share. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:39 pm
British marine hose manufacturer Dunlop Oil & Marine Ltd. agreed to plead guilty and pay $4.54 million fine in 2008. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:00 am by Michael Scutt
  The law as set out in the case of Hays Specialist Recruitment Holdings Ltd & anor v Ions & anor [2008] IRLR 904  is that any contacts made during the course of business for the employer will be confidential information and thus belong to the business when the employee leaves. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:50 pm by admin
HOJ Industried Ltd., [1992] 1 S.C.R. 986 at 998-999, the Supreme Court of Canada adopted these factors; in Honda Canada Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:02 am by war
Thus, in Watson, Laidlaw & Co Ltd v Pott, Cassels and Williamson (1914) 31 RPC 104, Lord Shaw expressed the principle: wherever an abstraction or invasion of property has occurred, then, unless such abstraction or invasion were to be sanctioned by law, the law ought to yield a recompense under the category or principle, as I say, of price or hire. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
Goodwin v NGN Ltd [2011] EWHC 1437 (QB) (09 June 2011): Identity of Fred Goodwin’s alleged mistress to remain secret but her occupation to be revealed. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:43 am
With so little time in which to make their oral submissions to the Court of Justice, counsel had to resort to extreme measures to make their point At the time of posting this item, there's no sign of the Advocate General's keenly-awaited Opinion in Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am by Carolyn Elefant
But in an Internet age, the bars’ powers are (or should be) constrained. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(PatLit) Judgment of similarity of designs in China (Class 99) Denmark When toilet seats make impressions on their users: Duravit AG v B&N Developing ApS (Class 99) Europe European patent – Further steps to enhanced cooperation (EPLAW) (IPJUR) (IPKat) (inovia) (IAM) General Court: More absolute grounds: KOMPRESSOR PLUS (Class 46) General Court confirms likelihood of confusion: Bianchin v OHMI – Grotto (GASOLINE) (Class 46) General Court finds HALLUX… [read post]