Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 5,796
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm
Smith of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presided over United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
Fifth, there is a state action overlay when it comes to Big Tech censorship (see Missouri v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Co., 19-cv-80633, 2019 WL 13277296, at *8-*10 (S.D. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 2:12 pm
Public Company, and Axon Enterprise Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:55 am
Few appellate court arguments have been more anticipated than the one happening Tuesday in Trump v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
General admission is free to the public. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Worley] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, James Heilpern and Michael T. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
Cases 444 (2023) [see § 61.03 n.1.2], delivery drivers were found to be employees on the basis that their service was publicly advertised to diners through its website and app. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
State Coll. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 5:58 pm
For example, in Sander v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 12:33 pm
From Richwine v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:22 am
In this suit between two siblings, the court granted summary judgment for the plaintiff sister on her derivative misappropriation claim, finding that the defendant brother essentially gutted their co-owned business that provided administrative and bookkeeping services for nursing homes, by setting up his own, separate company that hired all its employees to provide the same services and acquired its assets for a nominal price. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
”[6] One of the several disconnects between the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ animal studies and the human diseases claimed was the disparity of dose and duration between the relied upon studies and the service men claimants. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
See Walsh v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
On a recent episode of the Stanford Law School podcast, Stanford Legal, co-host Pam Karlan discussed the national abortion rights landscape after Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 9:15 am
2022cv1564-24 [9] Feist Publications, Inc., v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
