Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2008, 1:25 am
Regina (Tabernacle) v Secretary of State for Defence Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “A ban on innocuous activities on publicly accessible land owned by the Ministry of Defence was unlawful. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:05 am
AB and Others v Ministry of Defence Queen’s Bench Division “Claims for compensation by former servicemen in relation to exposure to ionising radiation as a result of nuclear tests carried out in the 1950s were not to be struck out either as time-barred or as having no reasonable prospect of success. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 2:07 am
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina Queen’s Bench Division “A foreign state was not entitled to claim sovereign immunity to avoid enforcement of a judgment validly obtained in another overseas jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 2:41 am
Official can decide twice R (Abdi) v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:36 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) Queen’s Bench Division “Fair trial provisions guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights could not be overcome by a claim that the offended party's case had no possible chance of success. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 9:00 am
The June 20, 2018 Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta decision in Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:35 am
Birmingham City Council v Dixon Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Evidence of a defendant's antisocial behaviour which occurred after the making of an application for an antisocial behaviour order against him was admissible when a court was determining (i) whether a defendant had acted in an antisocial manner and (ii) whether it was necessary to make an [...] [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:37 am
Akhurst v Director of Public Prosecutions Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “University grounds and buildings were not an enclosed area for the purposes of the Vagrancy Act 1824 which referred to any dwelling house, warehouse, coach house, stable or outhouse, enclosed yard, garden or area. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 3:24 am
Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd Queen’s Bench Division “An article which attracted qualified privilege when printed in a newspaper could lose that privilege if its electronic form was kept on the paper's website after circumstances had changed but the article was not modified to reflect that change in facts. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 1:50 am
Yeong v General Medical Council Queen’s Bench Division “While a doctor's clinical errors or incompetence might be addressed by remedial action to address his areas of weakness, such remedial action was less relevant where the misconduct consisted of engaging in a sexual relationship with a patient. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:48 am
Torres and Maverick v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 7:22 pm
She'd become Scotland's queen, and Britain's youngest-ever monarch, when her father, James V, died 6 days after her birth. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 8:31 am
The post GORDANA SCHIFANELLI v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 5:54 am
The post DEVRON LAMONT HYNSON v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 6:44 am
UK in breach of uninsured drivers’ duty Byrne v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 1:06 am
Ministry of Justice v Prison Officers' Association Queen’s Bench Division “Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing freedom of assembly and association, conferred no express right to strike and it was not breached by a court order forbidding any form of industrial action. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 8:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:54 am
I have a SCOTUSBlog case preview on next Tuesday's arguments in Allen v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:00 pm
2016 NY Slip Op. 08222 Decision This appeal was brought by the plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court of Queens County, October 16, 2014. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:48 am
Regina (Ghai) v Newcastle upon Tyne City Council Queen’s bench Division “The orthodox Hindu belief in the necessity of open-air cremation as a manifestation of belief within the meaning of article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights was limited by statutory provisions which were justified under article 9.2 of the Convention. [read post]
