Search for: "Quick v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 2,408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2022, 2:11 pm by ttetting
Earlier this year, on June 6, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Gallardo v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:03 pm
Did she make any use in commerce in the United States? [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm by Wells Bennett
Today I attended the hour-long oral argument in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:41 pm by Margot Patterson
 To do this, the Court considered case law in the United Kingdom and the United States. [read post]
 The California Trucking Association filed a writ of certiorari seeking review by the United States Supreme Court in August 2021. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am by MBettman
On July 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
& Elliott, Inc. (1997), United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:36 am by David Oscar Markus
United States has all kinds of great rhetoric. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:08 pm
I guess he wants to lock in the adverse ruling as the binding law of the Western United States. [read post]
According to the statement of the offense, on Jan. 24, 2017, Flynn voluntarily agreed to an interview with FBI agents, during which he said “he did not ask Russia’s Ambassador to the United States … to refrain from escalating the situation in response to sanctions that the United States had imposed against Russia. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 5:14 am by David Oscar Markus
United States, No. 09-479, holding that Section 924(c) and does not preclude the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences for different counts of conviction. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:00 pm by pkmiles@mqblaw.com
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the United States Supreme Court held that the NLRB needs at least three members to exercise its authority. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:56 am by christopher
Finally, it chides both sets of attorneys for failing to cite the United States Supreme Court case of DASTAR CORP. v. [read post]