Search for: "R G v. G S" Results 161 - 180 of 6,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2010, 2:18 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Bhamra v Dubb (t/a Lucky Caterers) [2010] EWCA Civ 13 (20 January 2010) G, R (on the application of) v X School & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1 (20 January 2010) Supershield Ltd v Siemens Building Technologies FE Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 7 (20 January 2010) In the Pink Ltd v Leeds Magistrates Court & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 8 (20 January 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) B2net Ltd v HM… [read post]
19 May 2021, 4:30 pm
Plus généralement, le cours explore aussi les raisons du renouveau de la due diligence dans l’histoire récente du droit international, et explique ce que ce renouveau nous révèle de l’état de l’ordre juridique et institutionnel international et de ses possibilités de réforme. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
This is especially the case in view of the board’s obligations under Article 21 RPBA (OJ EPO 2007, 536). [4.3.2] G 1/03 [2.1] is of particular relevance in relation to state of the art under A 54(3). [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:41 pm by admin
Après la révélation des faits, le suspect est généralement placé en garde à vue, entendu par des enquêteurs puis par le procureur de la République. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 2 July 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in Case C-240/18 P Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), advising that the EUIPO’s decision to reject the registration of the trade mark ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ because it was too offensive should be annulled. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 11:29 am
Contents include:Szilárd Gáspár-Szilágyi, A Standing Investment Court under TTIP from the Perspective of the Court of Justice of the European Union Robert Basedow, A Legal History of the EU’s International Investment Policy Kyle Dylan Dickson-Smith, Does the European Union Have New Clothes? [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 5:00 am by Aron Laszlo
The applicant appealed to the Metropolitan Court (Fővárosi Törvényszék) and requested the annulment of HIPO’s decision, and, secondarily, a referral to the CJEU. [read post]