Search for: "REITER v. STATE"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2013, 6:52 pm
Rebecca L.Kurz won in State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:14 pm
The Court relied on Barnes v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am
Lord Reed, reiterating his guidance in Hesham Ali, held that the distinction between positive and negative obligations is not of substantial importance, and that ultimately the question is whether a fair balance has been struck, which is determined by applying the structured approach to proportionality. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 8:57 am
Frommert v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 11:13 am
Copyright 2014 Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law A: 1255 W. [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:20 am
The Court reiterated that the right to freedom of religion, including the freedom to manifest one’s beliefs and to talk to others about them, could not be made conditional on any acts of State approval or administrative registration because of the risk that a State would dictate what a person must believe. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
State Lands Com. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 11:56 am
One year later, the United States Supreme Court decided Padilla v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 11:46 pm
Olivares-Rangel, 458 F.3d 1104, 1106 (10th Cir.2006) (interpreting Lopez-Mendoza as merely reiterating long-standing jurisdictional rule), and United States v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:38 am
Copyright 2012 Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law A: 1255 W. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:19 pm
” Citing another of its recent rulings in an arbitration case, Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 5:00 pm
In the meantime, in my judgment, the Board's structure violates the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 9:27 pm
The FCC Notice also asked why the current V Chip has seemingly not been used much by parents. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm
The Court held that that the procedure established under Art. 259 TFEU was designed to obtain a declaration that the conduct of a Member State was in breach of EU law and to terminate that conduct (see, to that effect, Joined Cases 15/76 and 16/76 France v Commission [1979]; Case C-456/05 Commission v Germany [2007]; and Joined Cases C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P and C-532/07 P Sweden and Others v API and Commission [2010]).Thus, as the aim of the Treaty was to achieve… [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 9:59 am
The panel reiterated that it was bound by United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:55 pm
’” United States v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 8:33 am
Testa and Defender Security v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 7:40 am
” Case citation: Wilson v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm
In its 2011 decision in Harrington v. [read post]
