Search for: "ROBERT COMES" Results 161 - 180 of 21,609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2016, 10:54 am by Robert Ambrogi
With this unveiling, Casetext, which has been free to use ever since its 2013 launch, is also preparing to roll out its first paid subscription tiers for premium services, while keeping basic […] The post New Casetext Feature Finds Relevant Cases For You, But Along With It Will Come New Pricing appeared first on Robert Ambrogi's LawSites. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 1:11 am
I come from the "guerrilla" style of negotiation practice. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 12:12 am
[A simple] explanation is that the wayward adverb in the passage is blowback from Chief Justice Roberts's habit of grammatical niggling.Language pedants [may believe in a] prohibition against "split verbs," in which an adverb comes between an infinitive marker like "to," or an auxiliary like "will," and the main verb of the sentence....Any speaker who has not been brainwashed by the split-verb myth can sense that these corrections go against the… [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:27 pm by Steve Shiffrin
In his syndicated column this week, George Will comes forward to claim that Lochner was rightly decided. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 3:54 pm
Close out your appellate year with a reading of Chief Justice Roberts' 2019 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciarywe have come to take democracy for granted, and civic education has fallen by the wayside. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 1:20 pm by Josh Blackman
The post Roberts the Creditor, Roberts the Debtor appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:34 am by Harold O'Grady
Episode 063 – Conversation with Robert Malesko, Class of 2011.mp3This podcast features Robert Malesko, Brooklyn Law School Class of 2011, discussing his career as a law librarian in the California court system before coming to BLS. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 2:54 am by SHG
The only question is how to come up with a seemingly legitimate way to justify reaching the desired outcome. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:34 am by Jon Gelman
Today's post was shared by Take Justice Back and comes from thinkprogress.org "Why The Roberts Court’s Anti-Consumer Decisions Are Even Worse Than They Seemed"Consumer Financial Protection Bureau director Richard CordrayThanks in part to several recent decisions by the U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 5:57 am by Ashby Jones
Jess Bravin, writing in Friday's WSJ, takes a look at the career trajectories of Elena Kagan and Chief Justice John Roberts, predicting that the two "could wrestle over competing visions of American law for decades to come. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 3:51 am by Jim Slaughter
” If your adopted parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) (“RONR”), there are several competing considerations: (1) RONR § 47 (p. 449) provides that the presiding officer has an obligation “to state and to put all questions that legitimately come before the assembly as motions . . . . [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 1:22 pm by Jamison Koehler
Photo by Patrick Green/Cal Sport Media It is exciting to think of Heisman Trophy winner Robert Griffin III in a Washington Redskins uniform next fall. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:35 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
We have a split personality when it comes to judges. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:06 pm by Steve Hall
[But] it is not too late to help Robert Gattis and prevent the additional suffering which will come from his execution. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:04 pm by Alfred Brophy
It is with great sadness that I write about the sudden passing of a terrific historian and a very generous and humane man, Robert F. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 1:33 pm by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Our colleague Robert O’Hara of Epstein Becker Green has a new post on the Workforce Bulletin blog that will be of interest to our readers: “OSHA Launches New COVID-19 Initiatives: With More to Come“. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:02 am by Richard Pildes
Her enigmatic, knowing smile comes to mind each time I re-read Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:22 pm by brian
Sometimes the interests of the powerless have to come first.In the new century, we seldom hear that answer in constitutional law. [read post]