Search for: "ROBERT W. KAGAN"
Results 161 - 180
of 397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court had a similar political split based on the party of the president who appointed them with Chief Justice John Roberts (Bush) and Associate Justices Anthony Kennedy (Reagan), Clarence Thomas (Bush I) and Samuel Alito (Bush II) on one side with Associate Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Clinton), Stephen Breyer (Clinton), Sonia Sotomayor (Obama), and Elena Kagan (Obama) on the other. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm
Justice Elena Kagan was recused.) [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm
Justice Elena Kagan jumped into the fray. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 11:51 am
The difference between Obama's appointees ( Kagan and Sotomayor) and Bush's (Roberts and Alioto) couldn't be more stark. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:39 am
Concepcion one year later and argues that “[w]e need the actual increase in access to justice that arbitration provides. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:05 am
Briefly: In an opinion piece at USAToday, Richard W. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
However, Chief Justice Roberts, and Associate Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Scalia, Sotomayor and Kagan, all expressed doubt that Congress could legislate in this area without encroaching upon the President’s authority to conduct the foreign relations of the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 7:21 am
Bellaizac-Hurtado, 700 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2012) • Elena Kagan, American Express Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:16 am
An existing member of the Bar of the Supreme Court must move for your admission; Stephen W. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:37 am
At his eponymous blog, Ed Mannino finds “much to recommend in the approach suggested by Chief Justice Roberts,” contending that “[l]imiting any decision to the rights of closely-held corporations would avoid the parade of horribles raised by several of the justices. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
However, Chief Justice Roberts, and Associate Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Scalia, Sotomayor and Kagan, all expressed doubt that Congress could legislate in this area without encroaching upon the President’s authority to conduct the foreign relations of the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm
David Zimmer (Harvard 2010 / W. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
Responding to the interchange with Roberts and Kagan by ackno [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:12 pm
What percentage of adverse consequences would suffice, Roberts asked, or how many visits to the emergency room? [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:28 am
Justice Elena Kagan echoed this practicality question. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:28 pm
Kagan questioned whether merits decisions by the Appeals Council would be reviewable. [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:01 pm
Only Justice Elena Kagan, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, dissented. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 5:41 pm
Michael W. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:48 am
” James W. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 10:27 am
” In the same vein, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan seemed to read the text of Section 11 as plainly barring the action on the facts of Slack’s listing. [read post]
