Search for: "Rands v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Patents In Nokia v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 12:52 pm
Here is the abstract: Less than a week after the Roberts Court issued its decision in National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius, Jeffrey Toobin, writing in The New Yorker, compared the first part of Chief Justice John Roberts's opinion, in which he found that the Commerce Clause did not authorize Congress to enact the "individual mandate" section of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that requires all individuals to buy health insurance, with an Ayn Rand… [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 8:06 am
(2) United State Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Bilski (business method) Patent Case (0) Transformers v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:45 am
In Perez v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:45 am
In Perez v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:19 am
National Collegiate Athletic Association, in which the court struck down the federal law that bars states from legalizing sports betting, is “a watershed moment that dramatically alters the landscape of the gaming industry in the United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:59 am
Motorola and Judge Alsup in Oracle v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Ingersoll-Rand Co., 14 P.3d 990, 995 (Alaska 2000) (§17); see also Munhoven v. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 4:56 am
State of California (2023) 98 Cal. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:00 am
And yes, I know your three word response will be "Plessy v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 12:08 pm
This is my second post today on Wednesday's filings in the Microsoft v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am
An account forwarded to Rand Associates for independent audit revealed more than £70,000 of errors, later confirmed in the Auditor’s report to the court. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 12:22 pm
LAWSUITS: FANTASY V. [read post]
2 May 2021, 5:23 pm
Rand A Technology Corporation. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
Furthermore, we conclude that, because "the analysis employed by this [C]ourt in the prior appeal no longer reflects the current state of the law, the doctrine of law of the case should not be invoked to preclude reconsideration of" Charter Oak's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for compensatory damages (Szajna v Rand, 131 AD2d 840, 840; see Foley v Roche, 86 AD2d 887, lv denied 56 NY2d 507). [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:38 pm
Pearlstein relies on the recent Comcast v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
" Oil States Energy Servs. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am
Regulation BI was adopted in June 2019, became effective September 10, 2019, and firms will be required to begin complying with the rule by June 30, 2020 (XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:28 am
Bilski and Rand A. [read post]
