Search for: "Reapportionment Cases"
Results 161 - 180
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2011, 5:31 pm
A recent example of this principle is the B.C. case of Kurmis v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 5:44 am
This Friday November 4th, Case Law presents its Law Review Symposium, “Baker v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:32 pm
The ACLU intervened in the case on behalf of individuals who wanted to defend the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:32 am
” The courts plan to save “historically important” case files, such as those involving “state reapportionment cases, civil rights voting cases, treason, national security, family farm, historic bankruptcy cases, and death penalty habeas corpus cases. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:32 am
The courts plan to save “historically important” case files, such as those involving “state reapportionment cases, civil rights voting cases, treason, national security, family farm, historic bankruptcy cases, and death penalty habeas corpus cases.” [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:29 am
Cases of historic significance would involve particular issues such as state reapportionment cases, civil rights voting cases, treason, national security, family farm and historic bankruptcy cases, and death penalty habeas corpus cases. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 9:14 am
But 25 years later, it stands for much more, pointing the reader to at least three themes and influences that manifest themselves in Justice Alito’s opinions: government’s legitimate role in “protecting traditional values”; the thought of Yale professor Alexander Bickel, a Burkean conservative whose work was largely overshadowed by the emergence of modern “Originalist” jurisprudence; and the Warren Court’s reapportionment cases, which… [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:19 am
A couple of years ago I blogged about my interest in teaching a class on Beer Law to explore various beer-related cases and what they tell us about constitutional (not to mention tort, contract, and intellectual property) law. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
Most common of these are reapportionment cases. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
First Derivative, a case that involved allegedly false disclosure in a prospectus issued by a mutual fund. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:00 am
In brief, the answer for Ansolabehere and Snyder is an unequivocal yes: “the effects of reapportionment [in the wake of BAKER v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 10:55 pm
” The case, Janus Capital Group Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Gibson Dunn’s Mark Perry led the team that won the Janus case and the following memo discussing the ruling was sent in by our friends at the firm: On June 13, 2011, the U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 7:58 am
Arturo Vargas, executive director of the National Assn. of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials and a veteran of reapportionment battles, called the new maps the “worst case scenario for Latinos in California….Officials from the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund said the commission appeared to make keeping cities and other communities together a higher priority than the federal Voting Rights Act, which protects minorities’ representation… [read post]
7 May 2011, 9:13 pm
There are both Federal and Virginia Constitutional cases stating that the parties who have standing to sue to invalidate reapportionment plans are those that will be voting in the offending district(s) in the next election. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:03 pm
If no one files a lawsuit then the old reapportionment plans could stay in place until 2021. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 5:53 pm
The principle of district-community congruence thus animates much of the relevant case law already. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm
In part, the rising (or in the case of Michigan actually falling) populations in each state are a referendum on the quality of life in that state. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:48 am
Nor was it consistently the case that incumbent-protecting gerrymanders were equally successful (compare California with New York). 4. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:02 am
Cohen, a spouse was awarded 75% of her costs after success on her reapportionment claim, which was the largest and most time-consuming issue. [19] The four step test identified by Bouck J. applies not only to matrimonial cases, but also to all types of cases where Rule 14-1(10) has application (Chaster (Guardian ad litem of) v. [read post]
