Search for: "Receivables Purchasing Co. v. R & R"
Results 161 - 180
of 938
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2016, 1:03 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:15 am
Taylor v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Co., [57 P.3d 1178 (Wash. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
Co., 232 S.W.3d 197, 204 (Tex. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 3:36 pm
Kaufman v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 1:14 pm
For a lively and informative discussion on personal jurisdiction in the context of commercial transactions, read International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 2:43 am
These plaintiffs received the benefit of the bargain, as a matter of law, when they purchased these products and were able to consume them. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 11:51 pm
In Armstrong v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:03 am
R. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:41 am
Corp. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:38 pm
In Peerless Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:25 am
Lane v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 3:06 pm
The ability to withhold the final payment was a contractual penalty and was therefore unenforceable under the principles laid down in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 3:06 pm
The ability to withhold the final payment was a contractual penalty and was therefore unenforceable under the principles laid down in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:12 pm
& Animal Husbandry Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:26 am
By Natalie Barletta In Retamco Operating, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:03 pm
Compare Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:43 am
C R Bard Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
Eastman Machine Co., 2009 NY Slip Op 32069(U) (Sup Ct Nassau County Sept. 2, 2009). [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:58 am
Pros—(i) It allows for innovation to be used at its marginal cost after the buyout; (ii) (maybe) as a condition, the patent holder could be required to disclose relevant research findings; and (iii) the government can purchase essential drugs, with the result that such drugs are available at prices near their cost of production, also putting downward pressure on the prices of the drugs not so purchased.Cons—(i) How to price the prize; (ii) the prize would have to be in an amount… [read post]
