Search for: "Redding v. USA"
Results 161 - 180
of 328
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 9:25 am
Sincerely, Robert V. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
Owens, 13-719 (granted at the April 4 Conference, relisted once); Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 1:59 pm
v. [read post]
Court finds much to dislike about proposed class action wage settlement; denies preliminary approval
10 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
Several provisions of the proposed settlement were troubling, and “their collective presence is a red-flag for potential collusion which weighs against granting approval,” the court wrote (Stewart v USA Tank Sales and Erection Co, Inc, March 4, 2014, Kays, G). [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
Q2: The famous copyright case Feist v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
In Ross v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 11:20 am
The Supreme Court's June 2013 ruling on U.S. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 8:35 am
Could it be their interests are aligned with that Red Line? [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 7:37 am
Finally Rachel Buker (Art & Artifice blogger and Intellectual Property Attorney at Ironmark Law Group, PLLC) gave her view that infringement would not have been foun,d had the Red Bus case been heard in the USA. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:36 am
As if to confirm its status as the red-headed stepchild of the Bill of Rights, the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
Other coverage comes from Thomas Merrill for this blog, Richard Wolf of USA Today, and Jeremy P. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm
By Gretchen Goetz and Helena Bottemiller By March of last year, lean finely textured beef (LFTB) had reached celebrity status under the unfavorable moniker “pink slime. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
Our co-blogger's opinionated piece continues, with my highlights of his distortions shown in red: ST. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm
What will happen in the Warman v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:17 am
Teva Pharmas., USA, Inc., 2012 WL 5364392 (M.D. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
If we don’t have any transcript, then we’ve also listed it, but in red. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
The 1994 Campbell v. [read post]
