Search for: "Richard Pildes"
Results 161 - 180
of 182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Comparative Constitutional Design, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Richard L. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:11 am
First-rate scholars have argued a range of failures, including Richard Pildes’s contention that Mueller abdicated a “core responsibility” in declining to reach a judgment on obstruction of justice and Jack Goldsmith’s argument that the Mueller report misapplied the law governing a president’s exposure to liability for obstruction.. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
Richard Wolf of USA Today and Michael Doyle and David Lightman of McClatchey Newspapers offer historical perspective on disputes between presidents and the Court; at Balkanization, Rick Pildes warns against too-easy analogies to FDR, noting that “it is also important to realize just how different that moment was — in terms of both the Court and the political branches — than where we are for now. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:14 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes remarks that during oral argument in Abbott v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 7:57 am
Richard Pildes explained on Election Law Blog yesterday, it’s possible that Kennedy has only joined the conservatives in Gill for the purpose of dismissing the case on narrow standing grounds. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
” Additional commentary and analysis come from Justin Levitt in an op-ed for The Washington Post, Richard Pildes in an op-ed for The New York Times, Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, Vann Newkirk at The Atlantic, Eric Segal in an op-ed for NBC News, Galen Druke at FiveThirtyEight, Carolyn Shapiro in an op-ed at The Hill, Thomas Mann at Brookings, Medium’s Flippable blog, Jeffrey Toobin at The New Yorker, and Walter Olson at the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, who… [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:13 am
” A contrary view comes from Richard Pildes, also at the Election Law Blog, who considers “today’s decision a major new precedent with broad implications, not just for racial gerrymandering issues, but for partisan gerrymandering ones potentially as well. [read post]
2 Sep 2007, 11:25 am
As Levinson and Richard Pildes argue, if one wants to guarantee oversight, one has to redesign our institutions to take account of the reality of party systems. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 6:06 am
I am reminded of an excellent essay (it is short, 14 pages, and clear, elegant, and accessible) by NYU’s Richard Pildes a couple of years ago on Cass Sunstein’s body of work which, of course, is central to this discussion. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
As law professors Daryl Levinson and Richard Pildes argued in an important 2006 Harvard Law Review article, during periods of unified government—when one party controls both houses of Congress and the Presidency—our system works very much like a parliamentary one, with the President finding support for his agenda in the legislature, while in times of divided government, separation of powers works all too well, for then a determined opposition can create gridlock.… [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes describes the decision as “a powerful example of what I call an ‘institutionally realist’ approach to judicial review of executive branch action. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 6:48 pm
As Professor Richard Pildes explained in a New York Times op-ed yesterday, “The court’s rejection of statewide challenges in the Wisconsin case will make gerrymandering litigation more complex. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
(Obviously, this calls into deeper question the continuing relevance of Madison, especially in light of the critique offered several years ago by Richard Pildes and Darryl Levinson of Madison in terms of "separation of parties" rather than of "powers. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Frederick Schauer and Richard Pildes call this idea "electoral exceptionalism," which posits that "elections should be constitutionally understood as (relatively) bounded domains of communicative activity" where "it would be possible to prescribe or apply First Amendment principles to electoral processes that do not necessarily apply through the full reach of the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 12:59 pm
SLS Professors Richard Thompson Ford and Pamela Karlan, co-hosts of Stanford LegalRich Ford: On the one hand, the election officials you talked about are under a lot of pressure. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Putting together a list of all law faculty blogs and law faculty bloggers is a surprisingly difficult task. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
Those plaintiffs are represented by noted voting rights professor Richard Pildes, among others.) [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
A recent article by NYU law professor Richard Pildes suggested that several recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court, most notably Citizens United, fit the “counter-majoritarian” thesis to a tee. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:30 am
As before, I want to thank Richard Albert, Ashley Moran, and Trish Mair for providing both the inspiration for the collective occasion and, in Trish’s case, the literally indispensable technical acumen to make it all happen with astonishing smoothness across many time zones and, in some cases, continents. [read post]
